The Tyranny of Evidence: Do Scientists Use Dogma?

Is evolution a religion? Should we describe the positions of scientists as dogma?
Is science democratic? Isn't there room for debate on the issues of science?
Why can't we teach both sides? Isn't that good science pedagogy?

Here's some links to additional information
1. [Neutral] Aquatic Ape Hypothesis (AAH)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquatic_...
2. Critical of AAH
http://www.aquaticape.org/
3. Favorable of AAH
http://www.primitivism.com/aquatic-ap...

4. [Neutral] Endosymbiotic Theory (EST)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endosymb...
5. Critical of EST
http://www.origin-of-mitochondria.net/
6. Favorable of EST
http://www.bio-medicine.org/biology-d...

7. [Neutral] for Intelligent Design
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellig...
8. Critical of Intelligent Design
http:// Entire scientific community / (hah, joke!)
9. Favorable of EST
http://www.discovery.org/